aaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!
Thursday, 28 May 2009 11:49 pmThis Week in WTF
So, on Tuesday the California Supreme Court upheld - narrowly, the analysts assure us - Proposition 8.
I'm not a lawyer, so I won't say too much about the decision itself. It may indeed be the case that the CaliSupremes can give the legal equivalent of a disingenuous shrug saying, "Hey, it's that wacky California constitution. What can you do?" and follow it with the sop of saying, "But you 18,000 couples? Good for you - you won the It's Not Retroactive Lottery!"
If that's the case, I hope, at the very least, that this will force people in that state to turn a magnifying glass to the entire Prop model, and give serious thought to just how broken it may be.
When it comes to non-legalese, however, I know where I stand. This. Stinks. On. Ice.
You can find most of my thoughts here, but one other thing occurred to me this week.
( And it's here, under the cut because it's long. )
So, on Tuesday the California Supreme Court upheld - narrowly, the analysts assure us - Proposition 8.
I'm not a lawyer, so I won't say too much about the decision itself. It may indeed be the case that the CaliSupremes can give the legal equivalent of a disingenuous shrug saying, "Hey, it's that wacky California constitution. What can you do?" and follow it with the sop of saying, "But you 18,000 couples? Good for you - you won the It's Not Retroactive Lottery!"
If that's the case, I hope, at the very least, that this will force people in that state to turn a magnifying glass to the entire Prop model, and give serious thought to just how broken it may be.
When it comes to non-legalese, however, I know where I stand. This. Stinks. On. Ice.
You can find most of my thoughts here, but one other thing occurred to me this week.
( And it's here, under the cut because it's long. )