Dept. of Catching Up
Saturday, 28 September 2013 10:49 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Far Less Swozzled Update
I have a rather busy day ahead of me, seeing as how I'm going to get the chance to meet and have coffee with the delightful
marence this afternoon, but I wanted to drop by and do at least a couple of things:
I'm sending belated birthday wishes to a longtime friend, once from Chicago and now from Minneapolis,
doclnghair, who celebrated on Sept. 21. I hope your year is filled with creative joy, many friends, love, and music.
I also wanted to wish the erudite
selenak - world traveller extraordinaire, Beatle fan and scholar, thoughtful television commentator and excellent fic writer - a happy birthday, as of yesterday. I hope the day was excellent; may the coming year be just as fulfilling!
Other things: Here, under the cut to spare those of you who want to avoid
kaffy_r 's job-related angst, is a description of the meeting that actually sparked my previous post. In describing the meeting to
yamx , I managed to encapsulate the entire bad craziness of that little corporate get-together.
And that, for the moment, is all.
I have a rather busy day ahead of me, seeing as how I'm going to get the chance to meet and have coffee with the delightful
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm sending belated birthday wishes to a longtime friend, once from Chicago and now from Minneapolis,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I also wanted to wish the erudite
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Other things: Here, under the cut to spare those of you who want to avoid
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Imposition of mandatory daily and weekly story minimums, complete with the declaration that we have to get stories up on the web immediately, "even if it's just a couple of paragraphs - you can expand on it later; we've got to beat Patch!"
This, despite the fact that the ability to put things up on our web site has actually been taken away from our editors and given to another section of the company, one that was created almost certainly to develop a staff of non-union editorial workers to be trained to do the work of us unionized reporters at less pay.
The artificial organizational wall erected in the company's pathological fear of and contempt for its original workforce actually works against its stated desire to become "digital first." Why? Because the extra layers of employees that control web access for our stories are people who don't know our communities and thus don't understand the context and importance of stories, who are also told to put "sponsored" stories (AKA advertorials) high up on the site, who are overworked because they have too many websites to deal with (we publish 33 or so newspapers in 33 or so communities.)
Add to that the fact that the company also imposed an entirely new editorial content platform through which to put things on the web - without getting rid of our platform, since they wanted us separate from editorial control so badly - that we have multiple technical problems as the two operating platforms clunk together and fail to work to get stories from reporter to editor to electronic page.
Oh, and the young people in the artificially separate department (they actually called them "vendors" in our meeting, and I laughed out loud. Told them that they could call them vendors all they wanted, but they were still employees) also use an aggregation algorithm to gather things off the web to put on our community websites. The program is automatic, and they often don't know that it's put weird YouTube things - or year old stories from our own archives - up as breaking news.
*stops, breathes*
Yeah, and one of the main architects of this, the man who called the meeting, came in for about seven minutes, made his "you must do these minimums and post, post, post!" speech - and then almost actually ran for the door, whilst saying "I'm leaving the rest to xxxx (his unfortunate lieutenant editors) if you have any questions."
Weaselly little dictatorial coward.
This, despite the fact that the ability to put things up on our web site has actually been taken away from our editors and given to another section of the company, one that was created almost certainly to develop a staff of non-union editorial workers to be trained to do the work of us unionized reporters at less pay.
The artificial organizational wall erected in the company's pathological fear of and contempt for its original workforce actually works against its stated desire to become "digital first." Why? Because the extra layers of employees that control web access for our stories are people who don't know our communities and thus don't understand the context and importance of stories, who are also told to put "sponsored" stories (AKA advertorials) high up on the site, who are overworked because they have too many websites to deal with (we publish 33 or so newspapers in 33 or so communities.)
Add to that the fact that the company also imposed an entirely new editorial content platform through which to put things on the web - without getting rid of our platform, since they wanted us separate from editorial control so badly - that we have multiple technical problems as the two operating platforms clunk together and fail to work to get stories from reporter to editor to electronic page.
Oh, and the young people in the artificially separate department (they actually called them "vendors" in our meeting, and I laughed out loud. Told them that they could call them vendors all they wanted, but they were still employees) also use an aggregation algorithm to gather things off the web to put on our community websites. The program is automatic, and they often don't know that it's put weird YouTube things - or year old stories from our own archives - up as breaking news.
*stops, breathes*
Yeah, and one of the main architects of this, the man who called the meeting, came in for about seven minutes, made his "you must do these minimums and post, post, post!" speech - and then almost actually ran for the door, whilst saying "I'm leaving the rest to xxxx (his unfortunate lieutenant editors) if you have any questions."
Weaselly little dictatorial coward.
Oh, and I forgot to mention earlier that Rory and the Doctor arrived about five or six days ago, and The Family Pond is now complete. I plan to bring them to the next set of union negotiations, put them out in front of me, and tell the guys across the table that if they can deal in fantasy scenarios affecting my livelihood, I can provide them with more fulfilling fantasy scenarios.
And that, for the moment, is all.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 09:26 am (UTC)You have soooo got to do a mashup with Wash's Dinosaurs Sketch from Firefly :P
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 06:28 pm (UTC)Good to see you; as they say in Chicago, how's by you?
No, they really say that.
no subject
Date: Monday, 30 September 2013 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 05:52 am (UTC)In their MBA coursework, did no one discuss that making it harder for people to do their jobs may make it, y'know, harder for people to DO THEIR JOBS?! Which affects, like, productivity. Or would that be too Deming-like?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 28 September 2013 07:02 pm (UTC)OMG. DEATH. I just...wow...wut?! How did so much stupid fit into one room?! Much less a meeting with a limited number of minutes?! Are these idiots aware of how many obstacles they've created for themselves?! OMG!!
Ffffff....
Dude!! So glad Rory and the Doctor arrived safely. And that sounds like a damned good idea to me! Raaarrrghhh...
*squishes you fiercely*
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 01:21 am (UTC)*HUGS*
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 28 September 2013 07:47 pm (UTC)The advertorial thing is sad. In the local newspaper they indicate (at least in the actual newspaper) that it is ad.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 12:59 am (UTC)Oh, they do the same thing on our website; the problem is that they place the "sponsored" stories so high up in the newsfeed that anyone coming to our pages could easily be forgiven for looking, deciding there was no actual local content, and back-buttoning the hell out of there.
As for what they're trying to create? They have no idea, sadly.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 12:22 am (UTC)I plan to bring them to the next set of union negotiations, put them out in front of me, and tell the guys across the table that if they can deal in fantasy scenarios affecting my livelihood, I can provide them with more fulfilling fantasy scenarios.
Made me laugh my ass off. Sadly, I think that these people are too stupid to get the humour. That is a very WTF sounding meeting and I'm sorry that you had to sit through it and deal with its resulting stupidness.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 29 September 2013 04:29 am (UTC)But hooray for tiny Rory and the Doctor arriving to help!
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 06:34 pm (UTC)And I've got the Doctor, Rory, Amy and River on my desk, standing in front of an oil-painted copy of Vincent's painting. It's all very comforting. Heh.
no subject
Date: Monday, 30 September 2013 08:39 pm (UTC)Fly in, scream at everyone, crap all over everything, and fly away.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 06:35 pm (UTC)