Where the hell is Mansfield Park?
Monday, 27 April 2009 11:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This Had Better Be Good.
Failing that, I had better be patient. Or perhaps we can have both "good" and "patient" in the same place - good literature and a patient reader..
I hasten to explain myself by informing you, my friends, of a precipitous and most unsensible purchase which I made lately of a local bookseller. I've picked up a rather hefty (but exceedingly well appointed, I again hasten to inform you) volume, entitled "Jane Austen: The Complete Novels."
Just why have I done this thing, you ask? Because in my more than five decades of life I have never - no, not once - read an Austen novel. Not one. Not one chapter of one, nor one paragraph of one chapter, nor even the slightest, slenderest, most trifling of sentences in one paragraph.
I have, however, watched a couple of BBC Austen adaptations, snickered my way through Lost in Austen, (ITV, right?) and decided that I should take a running jump at the lot of 'em.
Because if I am anything, it is precipitous. I am, it seems, more of a hasty Marianne than a level-headed Elinor. The entire collection of novels in one shopping bag. Foolish. Simply foolish - particularly when I remember that I cut my reading eye-teeth on fairytales, Sturgeon and Edgar Rice Burroughs. No, I don't read him now. But my literary palette still seems to overflow with the very bright colors. Purple amongst them.
I may retreat to my bedroom now, and read a chapter or two of something Austenish.
Failing that, I had better be patient. Or perhaps we can have both "good" and "patient" in the same place - good literature and a patient reader..
I hasten to explain myself by informing you, my friends, of a precipitous and most unsensible purchase which I made lately of a local bookseller. I've picked up a rather hefty (but exceedingly well appointed, I again hasten to inform you) volume, entitled "Jane Austen: The Complete Novels."
Just why have I done this thing, you ask? Because in my more than five decades of life I have never - no, not once - read an Austen novel. Not one. Not one chapter of one, nor one paragraph of one chapter, nor even the slightest, slenderest, most trifling of sentences in one paragraph.
I have, however, watched a couple of BBC Austen adaptations, snickered my way through Lost in Austen, (ITV, right?) and decided that I should take a running jump at the lot of 'em.
Because if I am anything, it is precipitous. I am, it seems, more of a hasty Marianne than a level-headed Elinor. The entire collection of novels in one shopping bag. Foolish. Simply foolish - particularly when I remember that I cut my reading eye-teeth on fairytales, Sturgeon and Edgar Rice Burroughs. No, I don't read him now. But my literary palette still seems to overflow with the very bright colors. Purple amongst them.
I may retreat to my bedroom now, and read a chapter or two of something Austenish.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 05:38 am (UTC)Second of all, YAY! I hope you enjoy them.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 05:58 am (UTC)K.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 06:34 am (UTC)I saw the BBC P&P before I ever read any Austen, and it only increased my enjoyment of the book.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:15 pm (UTC)I've read a couple, but don't really see the lure. Personally, it's a little creepy that the ribbons on a new hat are so consequential that there's no internal evidence whatsoever that this is the middle of the Napoleonic wars, with the Luddites for lagniappe.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 07:20 pm (UTC)And Pride and Prejudice I re-read most years - I had it as a separate (old) book before I got the set, and the texture of paper, the wovenish cover, all add to the experience.
Under a duvet, with a hot drink is a great way to read it.
I've come to the conclusion I need more Austenish icons - both of the ones I have loaded are Hugh Laurie. But I shall use one of them in tribute to the subject...
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:38 am (UTC)By the way, the icon refers to me, not you.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 08:08 am (UTC)True. Having just finished watching "Lost in Austen", the juxtaposition of the stately mode of speech with modern speech patterns really highlighted how alien they are to each other. Which was part of the fun.
By the way, I love your icon;
Thank you!
from where is that quote taken?
Probably from the Oxford Book of Quotations...
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 29 April 2009 07:26 pm (UTC)