kaffy_r: The TARDIS says hello (Jesus Approves)
[personal profile] kaffy_r
This Had Better Be Good.
     Failing that, I had better be patient. Or perhaps we can have both "good" and "patient" in the same place - good literature and a patient reader..
     I hasten to explain myself by informing you, my friends, of a precipitous and most unsensible purchase which I made lately of a local bookseller. I've picked up a rather hefty (but exceedingly well appointed, I again hasten to inform you) volume, entitled "Jane Austen: The Complete Novels."
   Just why have I done this thing, you ask? Because in my more than five decades of life I have never - no, not once - read an Austen novel. Not one. Not one chapter of one, nor one paragraph of one chapter, nor even the slightest, slenderest, most trifling of sentences in one paragraph.
   I have, however, watched a couple of BBC Austen adaptations, snickered my way through Lost in Austen, (ITV, right?) and decided that I should take a running jump at the lot of 'em.
   Because if I am anything, it is precipitous. I am, it seems, more of a hasty Marianne than a level-headed Elinor. The entire collection of novels in one shopping bag. Foolish. Simply foolish - particularly when I remember that I cut my reading eye-teeth on fairytales, Sturgeon and Edgar Rice Burroughs. No, I don't read him now. But my literary palette still seems to overflow with the very bright colors. Purple amongst them.
   I may retreat to my bedroom now, and read a chapter or two of something Austenish.


Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mack-the-spoon.livejournal.com
First of all, your icon is hilarious.

Second of all, YAY! I hope you enjoy them.

Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
I have a difficult, and difficult to describe, relationship with Jane Austen. I'll be interested in your perceptions, if you decide to publish them.

K.

Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 06:20 am (UTC)
kerravonsen: An open book: "All books are either dreams or swords." (books)
From: [personal profile] kerravonsen
My two favourite Austens are Pride & Prejudice and Persuasion. But I expect it will be rather odd to come to Austen having seen adaptions first; you might find the prose a bit stilted or slow-moving, I'm not sure.

Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 06:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] namarie24.livejournal.com
Aw yay! Glad you're reading 'em. So much goodness to look forward to!

I saw the BBC P&P before I ever read any Austen, and it only increased my enjoyment of the book.

Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com
One of my better all-time $/pound used book finds was the Modern Library Giant Complete Jane Austin for $6.
I've read a couple, but don't really see the lure. Personally, it's a little creepy that the ribbons on a new hat are so consequential that there's no internal evidence whatsoever that this is the middle of the Napoleonic wars, with the Luddites for lagniappe.

Date: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heatherbelles.livejournal.com
Oooh enjoy. I have a complete set, some of which I've read, others I've still not got round to reading, but the ones I have read, I've enjoyed.

And Pride and Prejudice I re-read most years - I had it as a separate (old) book before I got the set, and the texture of paper, the wovenish cover, all add to the experience.

Under a duvet, with a hot drink is a great way to read it.

I've come to the conclusion I need more Austenish icons - both of the ones I have loaded are Hugh Laurie. But I shall use one of them in tribute to the subject...

Profile

kaffy_r: The TARDIS says hello (Default)
kaffy_r

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Monday, 21 July 2025 05:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios